Skip to main content

“Religion yes, clergy no…. As we did without clergy, let us do without soldiers.” What impact did that have on society?

I'm not entirely sure what this question is asking, so I'm going to treat it as though it's asking about the significance of this quote in the overall story. 


In this very strange short story, Ursula K. Le Guin describes what a utopian society would be like. In this quote, Le Guin tells us that this society wouldn't have either clergy or soldiers. Since both religious people and the practice of war can be large sources of conflicts in a society, Le Guin presumably provides this detail to further support the idea that Omelas is perfect and peaceful.


The distinction between clergy and religion is an interesting one. Le Guin hints here that religious beliefs themselves aren't what typically cause conflict in today's world and that the people who practice and enforce religion are instead most often the sources of conflict. Thus, in Omelas, while people are free to believe in religion, there are no religious authorities to monitor the people. Le Guin leaves a lot unsaid here, leaving it up to her readers to further examine this idea on their own. 


Whether Omelas is peaceful because it doesn't have clergy or soldiers, or whether it is already so peaceful that it simply has never needed clergy or soldiers, is unclear. Again, Le Guin leaves this question for her readers to decide for themselves.


At the end of the story, Le Guin reveals to us that there is one terribly ugly and evil thing in this society (I won't spoil it for you! You should read it!). Thus, the quote about clergy and soldiers is significant in the overall story, because it presumably tells us that in order for a society to be "perfect" and do without authorities such as soldiers or clergy, there still needs to be one ugly, terrible truth beneath everything else. Is Le Guin saying, then, that societies need to have authority figures in order to succeed? Is she saying that there can never be any perfect society after all? It's unclear. The real beauty of this story is the plethora of questions it leaves behind.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more