Skip to main content

In Tangerine, did Paul Fisher have any friends in Houston, Texas?

That's a good question! He probably didn't have any friends in Houston, and here's why I think so.


The novel begins as Paul and his family are moving from Texas to Florida, and you'd think that a kid like Paul would think often of his own friends back in Texas while he was packing, moving, and making new friends. But he doesn't mention them, and he doesn't call or email any Houston friends after he moves.


We do know that Paul was on a soccer team back in Texas, so he had that opportunity to make friends, but we also know that his older brother stuck him with the nickname "Eclipse Boy" ever since Paul entered kindergarten--and we assume that Paul probably had trouble shrugging off that identity and making friends. But there's no mention of Paul's own Houston friends or the lack thereof throughout the novel, as far as I can tell.


We get a hint on page 109 about Paul's lack of friends back in Houston when Paul hints that, even on his Houston soccer team, he rarely got a chance to make contact with the ball. So we assume that Paul was a rather minor player on his team, not exactly popular. And then on page 124, Paul seems shocked to be extended an offer of friendship from the members of his new soccer team at Tangerine Middle School. The implication is that no one has ever quite accepted him before. Also, on page 140, Paul also seems shocked that a girl might actually be interested in him despite his dorky glasses. Page 181 describes Paul's family in a state of total surprise, as if it's the first time it happens, when someone says he was glad to meet Paul.


All this is evidence for the idea that Paul may have been friendless back in Houston. Whenever Paul does recall any memories from Houston, they're always focused on his vision, his relationship with his brother, and his struggle to recall what actually happened that damaged his eyesight.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...