Skip to main content

What happened between the last day of Passover and Pentecost in Elie Wiesel's Night?

On the evening before Pentecost, the Jews find out they are all being deported.


Things have already not been going well. It happened in stages. First, the Jews were forced into ghettos. These were kind of like walled neighborhoods, but very much like prisons. The outer houses had their windows boarded and no one could leave. Conditions were harsh. Jews had to wear yellow stars marking them. Then, on the night before Pentecost, Stern is called to a special meeting.



"What's wrong?" we asked.


"I don't know. I have been summoned to a special meeting of the Council. Something must have happened." (Ch. 1)



Wiesel’s mother says she has a bad feeling about it. She is right to worry. Stern was a shopkeeper. He and anyone else who used to be important are being called in because something terrible is about to happen. Moishe’s predictions of doom are coming true. The Jews are all being deported now.


When Wiesel's father returns, they hope nothing is wrong, but they can tell from looking at him that this is not the case.



"The news is terrible," he said at last. And then one word: "Transports."


The ghetto was to be liquidated entirely. Departures were to take place street by street, starting the next day. (Ch. 1)



The way the Germans rounded the Jews up was very systematic. Of course, it would have been next to impossible to take everyone overnight. They put the Jews in ghettos first to get them out of sight and out of everyday life. It had the added benefit of getting them in one place. Then they were trapped and easy prey.


Pentecost, or Shavu'ot , is a two day harvest festival celebrating the Torah. This is a particularly disruptive time for the Germans to be transporting the Jews. To try to destroy an entire religious or ethnic group is bad enough, but to do it during a time of religious significance is worse.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...