Skip to main content

What happened between the last day of Passover and Pentecost in Elie Wiesel's Night?

On the evening before Pentecost, the Jews find out they are all being deported.


Things have already not been going well. It happened in stages. First, the Jews were forced into ghettos. These were kind of like walled neighborhoods, but very much like prisons. The outer houses had their windows boarded and no one could leave. Conditions were harsh. Jews had to wear yellow stars marking them. Then, on the night before Pentecost, Stern is called to a special meeting.



"What's wrong?" we asked.


"I don't know. I have been summoned to a special meeting of the Council. Something must have happened." (Ch. 1)



Wiesel’s mother says she has a bad feeling about it. She is right to worry. Stern was a shopkeeper. He and anyone else who used to be important are being called in because something terrible is about to happen. Moishe’s predictions of doom are coming true. The Jews are all being deported now.


When Wiesel's father returns, they hope nothing is wrong, but they can tell from looking at him that this is not the case.



"The news is terrible," he said at last. And then one word: "Transports."


The ghetto was to be liquidated entirely. Departures were to take place street by street, starting the next day. (Ch. 1)



The way the Germans rounded the Jews up was very systematic. Of course, it would have been next to impossible to take everyone overnight. They put the Jews in ghettos first to get them out of sight and out of everyday life. It had the added benefit of getting them in one place. Then they were trapped and easy prey.


Pentecost, or Shavu'ot , is a two day harvest festival celebrating the Torah. This is a particularly disruptive time for the Germans to be transporting the Jews. To try to destroy an entire religious or ethnic group is bad enough, but to do it during a time of religious significance is worse.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.