Skip to main content

In "Ozymandias" by Percy Bysshe Shelley, why does the king refer to himself as the King of Kings?

King Ozymandias, who had a huge statue built of himself, was claiming to be the greatest of kings.


In the ancient world, kingdoms were typically very small.  Most kings were what we would today call local warlords.  It was possible for one king from a larger civilization to conquer many other kings of smaller kingdoms, building an empire.  He would then be greatest king, ruling over the small-scale kings, literally a "king of kings." 


When an empire-building king did conquer a foreign city or kingdom, it was not unusual for him to set up a stela, a stone pillar commemorating his victory, inscribed with a highly flattering description of how he had conquered.  Stelae were set up by conquering kings from Babylon, Assyria, Egypt, and Greece, among many others. 


The statue of Ozymandias and its inscription were apparently a version of a boastful stela, this time accompanied by a huge statue of the king (also not unheard of in the ancient world).  


The statue should remind us of the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar, who had a golden image made of himself, ninety feet high and nine feet wide, as recorded in the book of Daniel, Chapter 3.  Earlier in the book of Daniel, we see a similar statue being smashed to bits by a great rock.  Apparently a similar kind of humbling happened to Ozymandias. 


The irony in the poem is that this "king of kings," who was once so mighty and apparently feared by many people, is now reduced to a crumbling statue far out in the desert in an "antique land," who is heard of by no one except occasionally in a traveler's tale.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more