Skip to main content

In Fahrenheit 451, how does Guy Montag exemplify and/or challenge the traditional dystopian protagonist?

The traditional dystopian protagonist is unhappy with the civilization they live in and chooses to challenge the social and political systems of their society. Montag shares many similarities with traditional dystopian protagonists and exemplifies the anarchist character type. The quintessential dystopian protagonist is best portrayed by the character of Winston Smith from George Orwell's novel 1984. Montag, like Winston, is disenchanted with his society and initially feels hopeless. In both novels, the reader can identify with each protagonist. The audience feels sympathy for the protagonist and supports their efforts to change their dystopian society. Montag boldly decides to challenge society's norms by breaking several unjust laws. Like many traditional dystopian protagonists, Montag becomes an enemy of the state and needs to flee his society before being caught. Montag risking his life to find inner peace and express himself in a restrictive totalitarian society exemplifies the behavior and attitude of a traditional dystopian protagonist.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.