Skip to main content

What military alliances pushed European nations into war? (World War I and World War II)

In World War I, there were two alliances that pushed the world into war.  These alliances were the Triple Alliance and the Triple Entente.  The alliances did not cause the war to begin, but when the war did start, they caused it to spread farther than it might otherwise have done.


World War I started when Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia.  This came after a Serbian nationalist named Gavril Princip assassinated Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria.  Austria blamed Serbia for the attack and issued an ultimatum that Serbia was sure to reject, thus bringing about war.  So, the war began not because of alliances, but because of nationalist opposition to the Austro-Hungarian Empire.


However, the war spread because of alliances.  Austria-Hungary was part of the Triple Alliance.  They joined Italy and Germany in this alliance.  They were opposed by the Triple Entente, which was made up of Britain, France, and Russia.  Russia was allied with Serbia because both were Slavic countries and they felt the need to be allied against the ethnic German countries (Germany and Austria).  When Serbia and Austria-Hungary went to war, Russia felt compelled to enter the war on Serbia’s side and Germany entered on Austria’s side.  This activated the system of alliances and widened the war dramatically.  In this way, the existence of these alliances broadened the war, even if it did not cause the war.


It is somewhat harder to say that alliances pushed European nations into World War II.   WWII was fought by two main alliances, the Axis and the Allies.  However, these alliances were not really what pushed the European countries into the war.


It is more accurate to say that Hitler pushed European nations into WWII when he finally went too far and forced those nations to fight.  Britain and France declared war on Germany when Germany invaded Poland.  You could say that this was because they had alliances with Poland, but it was really because they finally decided that Hitler was a major menace to their security.  They fought to protect themselves, not for the sake of Poland, which was beyond their help in any case.  Hitler did not fight because of his alliance with Italy.  He fought to make his country more powerful.


When the USSR entered the war, it did so because Hitler attacked it.  In fact, the USSR and Germany had nominally been allies (or at least had a non-aggression pact) right up until Germany invaded.  Clearly, the USSR did not join the war because of an alliance.  Thus, it is difficult to argue that military alliances pushed European countries into WWII.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...