Skip to main content

What are some similarities and differences between the poems: "When I Heard the Learn’d Astronomer," "O Captain! My Captain!," and "I Hear...

One the face of it, these would seem to be very different poems. “Astronomer” is a poem about how nature and intuition is superior to academic knowledge; “I Hear America Singing” is a celebration of American labor, a poem in which Whitman embraces the everyday; “O Captain” of course is the famous elegy for Abraham Lincoln, represented by the beloved captain, who, after guiding the “ship” of the United States through the storm, has fallen before the victory can be celebrated. The tones of the poems are very different as well. In “Astronomer” the poet is “tired and sick” until he is revitalized by the open sky; in “I Hear” he is enthusiastic and celebratory; in “O Captain,” he is passionate and mournful.


As far as similarities go, I think voice and method are two elements that connect them. Different as they are, they are all unmistakably “Whitmanian.” By that I mean that they all share a certain conception of the relationship of the poet to his subject, which can be said to be “inclusive,” I guess. The poet is both part of the subject, and greater than it; he is both personal (Walt, an individual attending an astronomy lecture) and collective (an omniscient poetic “eye,” comprehending all Americans working everywhere), as well as a kind of poetic voice of conscience for the country (in “O Captain, he both plays the grieving son – “My father does not feel my arm” etc. – and, if we understand the poem symbolically, the voice of the grieving nation). 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.