Skip to main content

Was slavery all about racism?

I do not think that slavery was all about racism. It was also very much about economics. But I think it was far more complicated than two sentences can make clear.  Let me see if I can talk us through this to share my thoughts.


Racism is the perception that those of another race are inferior in some way and should be treated thus.  Those who participated in the slave trade found it easier to enslave Africans because they were of another race, had cultures that superficially seemed inferior to European or American culture, and of course, had few defenses against the invaders. These people were "the other," and as such, there was no need to treat them as fully human, a rationale in their minds for treating them no differently than beasts of burden. If we want to enslave a people and treat them like animals, it seems to salve our consciences to say they are another race, so somehow it doesn't count.  While it is impossible for me to see all of this through the eyes of an early slave trader or plantation owner, I do know it is always easier to demonize people whom we want to use for our own purposes or whom we want to brutalize, so that we can convince ourselves we are still good people.  In general I would say that racism made it easier for white people to enslave Africans than had they wanted to enslave people who looked like them.


However, money is a powerful motivator, and slavery is what built the American South into an agricultural powerhouse in its day.  It is hard to picture this today, but think about how much money a company could make if it didn't have to pay any of its workers!  Even if it had to shelter, clothe, and feed them, it would still come out ahead, if it did as the plantation owners did, spending as little as possible on any of their needs. Free labor is what the plantation owners had, as well as the offspring of slaves, who could be sold or become more free labor, the "interest" on their investment. I would say that had someone discovered a civilization of white people who could have been enslaved, we would still have had slavery, although people's consciences might have troubled them just a little as they deposited all their money in the bank. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more