Skip to main content

grammatical number - Why "pay top dollar" and not "pay top dollars"


Why do we use pay top dollar and not pay top dollars? Dollar is countable, so dollars look more correct.



Answer



I think the idiom started with advice by the State Board of Agriculture in New Hampshire, 1901...



It takes the bottom dollar to pay for the labor, the cost of production, the fertilizer, the taxes on the farm, and the mortgage and all that, but it is the top dollar that has the "funny business" in it. If you go to Europe with your wife next year it comes out of the top dollar.



Originally it didn't mean "obtain the top price" so much as "look to the 'margin' over fixed costs". Advice repeated in 1907 with similar wording by the equivalent Board in Massachusetts...



It is the only way to get the top dollar. It takes the first dollar to pay the rent of the land, and the next two or three for the labor, and the next dollar or two for the fertilizers, and another dollar or two for the spraying...



...and Vermont (but probably meaning, or at least implying, "top price" already)...



it is the breeder who produces the article always in demand that gets the top dollar for it.



...then by 1911 in trade publication The Poultry Item (definitely "top price" by now)...



I believe in every breeder getting every honest dollar he can out of his birds and if he has a specimen above the average in merit, to get the top dollar for him



It's not until 1931 that I find the first instance of "pay top dollar" (with the article "the" discarded), and even then we're still in the farming context, with American cattle producer: Volume 49



My customers thanked me for buying them preconditioned calves ... and will demand preconditioned calves and will pay top dollar for them.



Thus we see the dollar was perforce single when it started, and as the meaning gradually shifted, there was never a convenient point where it could be pluralised.


The phrase is often used in Britain too, but our own nearest "native equivalent" is pay top whack.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more