Skip to main content

american english - When do you use “learnt” and when “learned”?


Is learnt UK English and learned US? Is it that simple?


I’m used to using learnt, but my US spellchecker says it is wrong.



Answer



Merriam-Webster marks learnt as "chiefly British", and Wiktionary as "UK", adding that learned is the "Standard US English spelling". Quoting a linguist's comment from elsewhere,



[The Corpus of Historical American English] shows that learned has always been more common than learnt in American English. At least, since 1810.



So it's not like learnt is completely unheard of in Americal English, but learned has always been more popular, and according to the COHA timetable, the usage of learnt has been on a more or less steady decline since 1820:


alt text


(X axis: year, Y axis: incidences per million words.)


Nowadays, according to the Corpus of Contemporary American English, learnt is most popular in the context of fiction and academic publications, and least popular in newspapers:


           learned   learnt     RATIO

SPOKEN 9370 18 520.6
FICTION 9624 88 109.4
MAGAZINE 11924 18 662.4
NEWSPAPER 9224 6 1537.3
ACADEMIC 8921 96 92.9

What's more, even the British National Corpus has more cites for learned than for learnt. The stats look as follows:


           learned   learnt     RATIO

SPOKEN 161 291 0.6
FICTION 1066 409 2.6
MAGAZINE 341 171 2.0
NEWSPAPER 459 151 3.0
NON-ACADEMIC 778 321 2.4
ACADEMIC 837 273 1.6
MISC 1588 537 3.0

It is worth noting that Merriam-Webster, Wiktionary, the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, and Collins English Dictionary all list learned as both a verb form and an adjective, but learnt only as a verb form.


Lastly, here's a related question: Dreamed vs. Dreamt, Leaped vs. Leapt, Lighted vs. Lit.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.