Skip to main content

old english - Origin of -(e)s in present indicative third singular


I'm aware that it comes from a Northern dialect of Middle English as in:



He sing(e)s



With the full Northern conjugation being:



Ik sing(e)
Þu/ou sing(e)s
He sing(e)s
We/ye/they sings



But in Old English and other West Germanic languages, there wasn't -s or -r in the 3rd-person singular indicative present.


I know that many Northern dialect words come from Old Norse, and a little grammar.


The Norse Conjugation of mæla is:



Ek mæli vér mælum
Þú mælir þér mælið
Hann mælir þeir mæla



And the rune used to write the ending -r in Norse was originally used for the s sound and it remained the rune even when the sound changed, meaning that it was likely originally hann mælis. And there were many Vikings in Northern England.


Is Old Norse a reasonable origin for the third singular -(e)s? Is my little theory sound?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.