Skip to main content

grammar - "What's" in indirect questions


Lets consider the following:



The book doesn't explain, "What's the wisdom behind education?"



Changing this to an indirect question becomes the following:



The book doesn't explain what the wisdom behind education is.



Now, I found many instances on Google where structures like this weren't really converted to indirect questions. For example:



The book doesn't explain what's the wisdom behind education.


"[She] doesn't say what's really on her mind."



Edit:


And consider the following:



What's the logic behind it.


(a) I wonder what's the logic behind it vs. (b)I wonder what the logic behind it is.



(a) sounds better but why? And are these constructions acceptable?



Answer



Grammatically speaking, the last two examples are quite different. In the first example, what substitutes the predicative



The wisdom behind education is something.


What is the wisdom behind education? (question is about the predicative)


I don't know what the wisdom behind education is. <-- correct


I don't know what is the wisdom behind education. <-- too colloquial, unacceptable in formal writing.



Now, in the second example, what substitutes the subject.



Something is on her mind.


What is on her mind? (question is about the subject)


I don't know what is on her mind. <-- correct


I don't know what on her mind is <-- incorrect



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more