Skip to main content

Meaning of "duck"


This is an extract from the subtitles of a television series (Bones) in which Brennan have a talk with Booth:



Booth: The director will create a special unit. If I line my ducks up, I can head it up.


Brennan: I think I could be a duck.


Booth: No, we stick to the book. Cops in the street, squints in the lab.


Brennan: In this case, the Jeffersonian will issue a press release.


Booth: You do that, I'm a dead duck



I understand the meaning of the whole dialogue in principle, but the multiple use of the word duck in different ways makes me confused.


Because Brennan said "I could be a duck" I thought that "line my ducks up" means to line up a team. But this makes no sense to me at all. In the TV series, there are always the same people involved in investigations.


According to these idioms "get your ducks in a row" means "to organize things well". This makes sense. But now Brennan's answer is nonsensical.


Which meaning has duck in the first sentence by Brennan?


Note: I understand the latter duck (dead duck); it is explained as "someone or something that is certain to die or fail" and, likely, just used to complete this wordplay.



Answer



This is all wordplay based on two idioms, both of which you mentioned:



ducks in a row or ducks in a line — plan every detail out


sitting duck or dead duck — being in a position with no desirable outcome; usually involving someone shooting or killing you



Booth's initial, "If I line my ducks up..." implies that if he plans every detail out just right he can lead the special unit. Brennan's offer of being a "duck" is an offer to help Booth out — she can be one of the details in Booth's planning. This is the answer to your question, "Which meaning has duck in the first sentence by Brennan?"


The next two lines set up Booth's final statement which switches to the "dead duck" idiom. The wordplay here is simply banking off of the earlier use of a separate duck idiom. The two uses are not specifically related other than they both refer to ducks.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.