Skip to main content

How is Macbeth presented as superior at the beginning of the play?

Early in Shakespeare's Macbeth, Macbeth is seen as a respected military leader and nobleman. He has a strong relationship with King Duncan and has proven himself effective on the battlefield.


In Act I, scene ii, the Captain reports to Duncan that the Scots, under the command of Macbeth and Banquo, have defeated the Norwegians in a particularly bloody battle. Macdonwald, Thane of Cawdor, has betrayed the crown and fought with the Norwegians. To punish Macdonwald and reward Macbeth, Duncan decides to give Macbeth the title Thane of Cawdor. 


A couple of scenes later, in Act I, scene iv, Duncan awards Macbeth the title and addresses him as "My worthy Cawdor" (line 47). Despite receiving the acclaim of the king, though, Macbeth is resentful because it is in this same scene that Duncan names his oldest son, Malcolm, as his official heir. Macbeth sees that someone else is above him in the line of succession, and in order to feel superior again, he vows to eliminate the threat of Malcolm. Macbeth's superiority complex is exacerbated by the witches' prophecies in Act I, scene iii. Once he hears that he will become "King hereafter" and receives the zealous encouragement of his wife, Macbeth will do everything in his power to gain and keep the highest position in the country. 


Macbeth's superiority, both in his own mind and in the reality of his position as king, does not last long, however. His ambition and paranoia cause Macbeth to make mistakes that come back to haunt him and result in his death at the end of Act V. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more