Skip to main content

What do you think would have happened if the climax in Jane Eyre changed ?

Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre is often regarded as one of the earliest major feminist novels because it gives voice and opportunity to a woman in the patriarchal society of the Victorian Era. In nineteenth century England, women were regarded as commodities with little subjectivity.  This caused marriages to be perceived as transactions instead of unions, and women were often stripped of individuality and power when under their male counterparts.  Thus, when the climax of the novel arrives with Jane’s decision to not accept St. John Rivers’ proposal, Jane demonstrates female autonomy that is a crucial element to the novel’s feminist stance. 


 Jane perceives her proposed marriage with St. John as a “sacrifice” on her behalf.  She states, “If I do go with him—if I do make the sacrifice he urges, I will make it absolutely: I will throw all on the alter—heart, vitals, the entire victim” (Brontë 466).  The figurative language of this quote aligns her marriage to St. John as an actual “killing” of her identity.  She metaphorically compares the union to physical loss, and she refers to herself as a “victim.”  Here, Jane adopts the patriarchal language of the Victorian society.  If she were to marry St. John, she would lose her existence as an autonomous woman. 


Further, there is no inherent love between Jane and St. John, as Jane claims that he is in love with “a beautiful young lady called Rosamond. He wanted to marry me only because he thought I should make a suitable missionary’s wife, which she would not have done” (Brontë 511).  Again, Jane describes the marriage as a “business arrangement,” for St. John wants to marry her not out of love, but economic and social asset. This again relies heavily upon the patriarchal language of the time because it reduces Jane to a commodity.  Jane condemns St. John’s decision to marry without love, stating that for St. John to “endure all forms of love” without passion is “monstrous” (Brontë 467).  The fact that Jane holds love in high regards when it comes to marital unions is uncommon for the Victorian Era. 


Thus, if the climax of Jane Eyre changed and Jane did accept St. John’s proposal, the feminist virtues of the novel would be undermined.  First and foremost, Jane would have to sacrifice her identity and desire to marry for love.  In Victorian England, women were instructed to be submissive, and if Jane gave way to St. John’s wishes, she would throw away her own identity and voice.  This is captured in Jane’s decision to remain in England:



I believe I must say, yes — and yet I shudder. Alas! If I join St. John, I abandon half myself . . . I should suffer often, no doubt, attached to him only in this capacity: my body would be under rather a stringent yoke, but my heart and mind would be free. I should still have my unblighted self to turn to: my natural unenslaved feelings with which to communicate in moments of loneliness. (Brontë 503-507)



Jane realizes that she cannot go with St. John if she is to remain an empowered woman.  Jane protects her freedom by refusing the proposal.  Therefore, if the climax was reversed, Jane would revert to a submissive woman who yields to the commands of her male counterparts.  This would greatly affect the rest of the narrative, not just in setting, as Jane would be moved to India, but it would affect the characterization of the women characters, as the main protagonist would have succumb to the constraints of the Victorian patriarchy.  The novel would no longer be an expression of feminine autonomy, but a casebook of how women were suppressed in such a gendered society.     

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more