Skip to main content

What do you think would have happened if the climax in Jane Eyre changed ?

Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre is often regarded as one of the earliest major feminist novels because it gives voice and opportunity to a woman in the patriarchal society of the Victorian Era. In nineteenth century England, women were regarded as commodities with little subjectivity.  This caused marriages to be perceived as transactions instead of unions, and women were often stripped of individuality and power when under their male counterparts.  Thus, when the climax of the novel arrives with Jane’s decision to not accept St. John Rivers’ proposal, Jane demonstrates female autonomy that is a crucial element to the novel’s feminist stance. 


 Jane perceives her proposed marriage with St. John as a “sacrifice” on her behalf.  She states, “If I do go with him—if I do make the sacrifice he urges, I will make it absolutely: I will throw all on the alter—heart, vitals, the entire victim” (Brontë 466).  The figurative language of this quote aligns her marriage to St. John as an actual “killing” of her identity.  She metaphorically compares the union to physical loss, and she refers to herself as a “victim.”  Here, Jane adopts the patriarchal language of the Victorian society.  If she were to marry St. John, she would lose her existence as an autonomous woman. 


Further, there is no inherent love between Jane and St. John, as Jane claims that he is in love with “a beautiful young lady called Rosamond. He wanted to marry me only because he thought I should make a suitable missionary’s wife, which she would not have done” (Brontë 511).  Again, Jane describes the marriage as a “business arrangement,” for St. John wants to marry her not out of love, but economic and social asset. This again relies heavily upon the patriarchal language of the time because it reduces Jane to a commodity.  Jane condemns St. John’s decision to marry without love, stating that for St. John to “endure all forms of love” without passion is “monstrous” (Brontë 467).  The fact that Jane holds love in high regards when it comes to marital unions is uncommon for the Victorian Era. 


Thus, if the climax of Jane Eyre changed and Jane did accept St. John’s proposal, the feminist virtues of the novel would be undermined.  First and foremost, Jane would have to sacrifice her identity and desire to marry for love.  In Victorian England, women were instructed to be submissive, and if Jane gave way to St. John’s wishes, she would throw away her own identity and voice.  This is captured in Jane’s decision to remain in England:



I believe I must say, yes — and yet I shudder. Alas! If I join St. John, I abandon half myself . . . I should suffer often, no doubt, attached to him only in this capacity: my body would be under rather a stringent yoke, but my heart and mind would be free. I should still have my unblighted self to turn to: my natural unenslaved feelings with which to communicate in moments of loneliness. (Brontë 503-507)



Jane realizes that she cannot go with St. John if she is to remain an empowered woman.  Jane protects her freedom by refusing the proposal.  Therefore, if the climax was reversed, Jane would revert to a submissive woman who yields to the commands of her male counterparts.  This would greatly affect the rest of the narrative, not just in setting, as Jane would be moved to India, but it would affect the characterization of the women characters, as the main protagonist would have succumb to the constraints of the Victorian patriarchy.  The novel would no longer be an expression of feminine autonomy, but a casebook of how women were suppressed in such a gendered society.     

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of the greeting "Sweet dreams".

Does anybody know the etymology of the phrase "sweet dreams"? I tried googling but did not find anything satisfying. Is this a relatively new phrase of the modern world or has this been in use for some time? I think it's the latter one. Answer The OED has the interjection as "a farewell to someone going to bed" from the 20th century: 1908 Sears Roebuck Catal. 198/1 Tenor Solos..Good Bye, Sweet Dreams, Good Bye. But it goes back until at least the 19th and possibly 18th centuries. John Wolcot, writing under the pseudonym of Peter Pindar, used it in his poem "Orson and Ellen; A Legendary Tale" published in 1801: Also from 1801 in The infernal Quixote (Page 287) by Charles Lucas: In the March 1776 of The Universal Magazine was published "The Serenade. A Pastoral Tale. From the German of Gesner" , where the shepherd Daphnis watches over his beloved as she sleeps and sings: The same tale appears in 1776's as Idyl XI, " Daphnis ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are the similarities between the relationships of the characters in The Outsiders and Romeo and Juliet?

At first glance, it might appear as if the characters in  The Outsiders  by S. E. Hinton and  Romeo and Juliet  by William Shakespeare do not have much in common; however, when one isolates the core of the conflicts, it becomes clear that the relationships in both stories are rooted in rivalry and secrecy.  In both  The Outsiders  and  Romeo and Juliet , an overarching theme is rivalry. While   socioeconomic status separates the greasers from the Socs in The Outsiders , last names separates the Montagues from the Capulets, who appear to be relatively equal in terms of socioeconomic status. Due to these rivalries, there are instances of deadly interactions in both stories. In  The Outsiders , Johnny kills Bob (whether his actions were justified or not is debatable). In  Romeo and Juliet , Romeo kills Tybalt and Paris, and Tybalt kills Mercutio. These deaths have profound effects on the main characters. In Ponyboy's case, the Johnny's death and other events in the novel inspire h...
Post a Comment
Read more