Skip to main content

In "The Lottery" by Shirley Jackson, what happens if someone misses or isn't present at the drawing?

When someone misses the drawing, another family member must draw on his or her behalf.


During the proceedings, Mr. Summers, the man who presides over the lottery, must ensure that everyone is accounted for. On one particular occasion, a man named Clyde Dunbar is absent. Accordingly, Dunbar has broken his leg, and so, he cannot attend the drawing. Mr. Summers asks who will draw on Dunbar's behalf, and Dunbar's wife answers that she will do the honors.


Upon hearing this, Mr. Summers asks whether Mrs. Dunbar has a grown son who will draw for his father. She responds that their son, Horace, isn't sixteen yet and therefore, cannot draw for his father. Interestingly, even though everyone in the crowd knows that Horace isn't of age, Mr. Summers must follow protocol and formally ask the necessary questions when someone is absent.


Mr. Summers then asks whether the "Watson boy" is drawing this year. The boy answers in the affirmative and confirms that he will be drawing for himself and his mother. Interestingly, there is no explanation for why a young boy can draw for his mother but Horace cannot draw for his father, Clyde. As the story progresses, however, we get the idea that tradition is extremely important to the members of the community. The people are willing to keep in place the arbitrary rules and rituals that dominate their lives, so long as things can continue as they always have.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.