Skip to main content

Seven and one-half foot-pounds of work is required to compress a spring 2 inches from its natural length. Find the work required to compress the...

Hooke's law  is written as `F = kx`


where:


 `F`  = force


`k` = proportionality constant or spring constant


`x` = length displacement from its natural length


Apply Hooke's Law to the integral application for work: `W = int_a^b F dx` , we get:


`W = int_a^b kx dx`


`W = k * int_a^b x dx`


Apply Power rule for integration: `int x^n(dx) = x^(n+1)/(n+1)`


`W = k * x^(1+1)/(1+1)|_a^b`


`W = k * x^2/2|_a^b`



From the given work: seven and one-half foot-pounds (7.5 ft-lbs) , note that the units has "ft" instead of inches.   To be consistent, apply the conversion factor: 12 inches = 1 foot then:



 `2` inches = `1/6` ft



`1/2` or `0.5` inches =`1/24` ft


To solve for k, we consider the initial condition of applying 7.5 ft-lbs to compress a spring  `2` inches or `1/6` ft from its natural length. Compressing `1/6` ft of it natural length implies the boundary values:` a=0` to `b=1/6` ft.


Applying  `W = k * x^2/2|_a^b` , we get:


`7.5= k * x^2/2|_0^(1/6)`


Apply definite integral formula: `F(x)|_a^b = F(b)-F(a)` .


`7.5 =k [(1/6)^2/2-(0)^2/2]`


`7.5 = k * [(1/36)/2 -0]`


`7.5= k *[1/72]`



`k =7.5*72`


`k =540`



 To solve for the work needed to compress the spring with additional 1/24 ft, we  plug-in:` k =540` , `a=1/6` , and `b = 5/24` on `W = k * x^2/2|_a^b` .


Note that compressing "additional one-half inches" from its `2` inches compression is the same as to  compress a spring `2.5` inches or `5/24` ft from its natural length.


`W= 540 * x^2/2|_((1/6))^((5/24))`


`W = 540 [ (5/24)^2/2-(1/6)^2/2 ]`


`W =540 [25/1152- 1/72 ]`


`W =540[1/128]`


`W=135/32` or `4.21875` ft-lbs

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more