Skip to main content

In The Things They Carried, why do the soldiers lighten their burdens by making insensitive jokes about casualties?

Dehumanization is a common threat shared among military members across centuries of warfare.  It is lessening the human characteristics of the enemy through ridicule, denial, sarcasm and labels that tend to shift the focus away from human characteristics toward generic or non-human characteristics.  In essence, it is removing the human from humanity.  Although typically associated with warfare, dehumanization can be found in non-violent conversation and is generally part of racial epithets.


In The Things They Carried, each member of Alpha Company bears a burden of guilt and fear.  The deaths Alpha Company suffers weigh heavily upon the living.  Lemon's death was perhaps preventable.  Lavender's death happened during a moment of nostalgia by Lt Cross, who wonders later if his inattention contributed.  Kiowa's death in an unbelievably senseless manner forever alters the members of the company.  The fear of death and suffering the soldiers face each day wreaks havoc with their mental well being.  In order to offset the guilt and fear the group turns to dehumanizing the enemy.  This allows them to attach their feelings to a generic entity and thereby further avoid guilt by blaming an actual person.  In short, the members use jokes to defray the mental anguish they all suffer.


The act of dehumanization as a coping mechanism is long understood and acknowledged among the military.  Nazis referred to Jews as "rats", US service members labeled North Vietnamese as "Charlie", and others have been called "dogs" and "cockroaches".  These terms are designed to separate the speaker from the emotional consequences of killing another human.  Even in self-defense, taking another life is not an easy thing.  There will be scars.  Dehumanization helps to offset the emotional grief in a mental coping mechanism.


The simplest answer?  To survive. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more