Skip to main content

How do Napoleon and the pigs gain power?

In Animal Farm, Napoleon and the other pigs begin to take power long before the Rebellion against Mr Jones takes place. Once Old Major dies, at the beginning of Chapter Two, for example, the pigs start organising for the Rebellion, though they have no idea when it might happen, because they feel that it is their "duty." Part of the reason for this lies in their perceived intelligence:



The work of teaching and organising fell naturally upon the pigs, who were generally recognised as being the cleverest of the animals.



Whether they really are the most intelligent animals on the farm is not important. What is important, however, is that the pigs play to this stereotype so that the other animals trust and respect them.


The pigs also take power through their development of Old Major's teachings into the system known as Animalism. They conduct secret meetings at night, for instance, in which they teach these principles to other animals. The other animals do not seem to truly grasp the meaning of Animalism, as we learn in the text:



At the beginning they met with much stupidity and apathy.



This stupidity enables the pigs to gain ideological control of the Revolution and manipulate its aims and objectives to suit their own agenda. Once the Rebellion takes place and Mr Jones is overthrown, the pigs quickly create the Seven Commandments, which establishes the new regime on the farm.


By acting quickly and by taking ideological control of the Rebellion, then, the pigs become the 'natural' leaders of this new regime and their ascent to power is a foregone conclusion.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more