In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson cites the inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. He states that governments derive their power "from the consent of the governed." In this viewpoint, government exists for the people's benefit. He then goes on to describe how the British government has deprived the colonists of these rights. He describes how colonial legislatures have been dissolved without cause, and how the British officials have seized property without a right to do so. He cites taxation practices against colonists who have no way to protest in Parliament. Jefferson goes on to describe the practice of quartering soldiers in time of peace in the colonies, which many colonists viewed as a threat. Jefferson carefully constructs his argument to demonstrate that the Declaration of Independence is not something lightly entered; rather, it is the last resort of a people who have had their rights trampled for far too long.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment