Skip to main content

In Act 3 of Macbeth, how does Lady Macbeth feel after the banquet scene?

Presumably, she feels disappointed and embarrassed by her husband's behavior.  As the party was breaking up, Lady Macbeth chastises her husband, saying, "You have displaced the mirth, broke the good meeting / With most admired disorder" (3.4.132-133).  She's been humiliated by what she perceives as her husband's cowardly behavior in regards to the presence of Banquo's ghost (of which she and the rest of their guests are insensible).  


Lady Macbeth believes that Macbeth thinks he is seeing Duncan's ghost, and she says that Macbeth has been "unmanned in folly," and she yells at him, "Fie, for shame!" (3.4.88, 3.4.90).  She hastily dismisses their dinner guests, both, it seems, to prevent them from seeing more of Macbeth's odd and guilty-seeming behavior as well as because she is so exhausted from the effort of keeping up appearances.  When they are all gone, her answers to Macbeth's questions are short, even clipped.  Perhaps she is angry with him, disappointed in him certainly.  He goes on and on, and she simply tells him, "You lack the season of all natures, sleep" (3.4.173).  However, from her sleepwalking in Act 5, scene 1, it looks as though it may be Lady Macbeth who lacks sleep; she is clearly not sleeping peacefully anymore. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...