Skip to main content

What is Jonas's first reaction to his assignment after the chief elder names the qualities he posed? How do his feelings change?

Jonas is selected, not assigned, as the next Receiver in chapter 8. Everyone, including Jonas, is surprised when the Chief Elder announces his role in the community. As the Chief Elder explains that the Receiver-in-training will be alone and apart, "Jonas listened with increasing unease" (62). This means that he's not feeling too confident about his new responsibility at the moment. The Chief Elder continues to say that all of the elders have been watching Jonas for a very long time. She also says that he has demonstrated all of the qualities that he needs to be the Receiver. Those qualities are: intelligence, integrity, courage, wisdom, and the ability to see beyond. The Chief Elder says that they "feel certain" that he is brave; but, "He did not feel brave at all. Not now" (63).


Once the Chief Elder finishes with discussing the Capacity to See Beyond, she looks at Jonas along with the whole audience. As everyone is silently gazing at him, the text says, "he froze, consumed with despair" (63). Therefore, his first reaction is that he feels despair. He looks out over the audience and he sees them all in a flash of color, even though he doesn't understand what color is just yet. It is at this point that he starts to feel more sure of himself. Then, when everyone starts chanting his name, Jonas feels accepted and important. "His heart swelled with gratitude and pride" (64).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.