Skip to main content

Which two colonies were set up by Spain in the New World?

Due to several ambitious explorers sailing to the New World on behalf of Spain, there were many Spanish colonies. Spain conquered a great deal of land in the New World. This land can be divided into two regions: North America and South America. In North America, the Spanish colonized Florida and what is today Mexico, Central America, and the western half of the United States. The Spanish also colonized the western half of South America.  


Spanish colonization in Central and South America had major longterm effects. It is because of this colonization that Spanish is spoken in most countries in these parts of the world. Many local Spanish dialects developed over time. Spanish colonization is also also the reason why Roman Catholicism is widespread in Central and South America.


Though the Spanish colonized a massive amount of land, most of their colonies had gained independence by the 1820s. Cuba and Puerto Rico were Spain's last two colonies, as they were not acquired by the United States until 1898.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.