Skip to main content

What is the difference between diffusion and osmosis?

Diffusion and osmosis are both examples of passive transport. Passive transport does not require any energy to happen. It is a natural process that moves materials from an area of higher concentration to an area of lower concentration. The differences in concentration of materials is called a concentration gradient, and substances naturally move down (higher to lower) the gradient.  For example, when you put a drop of food coloring in a glass of water, the food coloring will begin moving from where there is a high concentration of food coloring to where there is a lower concentration of food coloring.  This will occur until equilibrium is reached and the food coloring is evenly spread out.  Osmosis and diffusion both work passively based on a concentration gradient. 


A difference between osmosis and diffusion is that diffusion can occur in any mixture (with or without a semipermeable membrane), but osmosis always occurs across a semipermeable membrane.


Another key difference is that osmosis is only the movement of water across the membrane. 


When I teach this concept to my students, I stress that osmosis is the diffusion of water.  I also like to say that all osmosis is diffusion, but not all diffusion is osmosis.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more