Skip to main content

What does the poet think about the owner of the woods?

The speaker of Frost's poem knows to whom the woods belong.


While at first he does not seem worried about trespassing because the owner will not see him,



Whose woods these are I think I know....   
He will not see me stopping here   
To watch his woods fill up with snow.



there is yet the sense that the speaker feels he is committing some sort of violation as he remarks that his horse must think it odd that they have stopped because there is no farmhouse or barn nearby: 



He gives his harness bells a shake   


To ask if there is some mistake.




In addition, there is a sense of hesitation and doubt generated by the phrase of the first line: "I think I know." The horse is stopped, and he shakes his head; then, although the speaker professes that he has a long way to go, he remains in the spot at which he has stopped. This static quality is emphasized by the rhyme scheme of the poem: aaba bbcb cede. For the second stanza picks up the rhyme of line b in the first, and the third stanza carries along line c, thus generating little movement.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more