Skip to main content

What are the disadvantages of privatization ?

By privatization, I assume you are referring to the handing off of governmental functions to private purveyors, for example, the private prisons that now sometimes house sentenced criminals.  The disadvantages of privatization flow from the fact that, in a capitalist economy such as we have in the United States, private entities are generally for-profit and thus have a completely different mission from the government.  A for-profit company exists to maximize profit.  A government exists to carry out government functions such as educating its citizenry, distributing various benefits to create a safety net,  and providing safety and security.  These missions are quite often at odds with one another.  Let's look at two examples. 


The privatization of prisons has for the most part meant that prisoners are not properly cared for and that there is an incentive to encourage more people to be imprisoned.  The government, as it imprisons people, is responsible for not overcrowding, for proper meals, and for medical care, at the very least. Less could be considered cruel and unusual punishment.  When the government runs its prisons, it takes care to do so properly.  The buck stops there.  But when a private entity runs the prisons, it wants to make as much money as possible, sometimes accomplishing this by cutting back on food or medical care and sometimes not having enough staff. There may very well be government inspections of the facilities from time to time, but in between, these places are inclined to do their very worst, so they can make more money.  Furthermore, the government has no particular incentive to imprison more people, but the private prisons do.  There was a horrific situation in Pennsylvania in which at least one judge was getting kickbacks from a privately run prison camp for juveniles, for those he sentenced to the camp, whether or not they were guilty.  Situations like this cannot exist when a prison is government-run. 


The disadvantages for a privately-run school are the same as they are for prisons.  I am speaking now of K-12 education, which should be offered everywhere by government.  We now have many charter schools that are for-profit institutions, and again, their bottom line is far more important to them and their investors than the education of children.  These are particularly reprehensible, since each student who is attending a privately-run charter school is being paid for by the taxpayers, taking funds away from the children left behind in the public schools and helping these private schools profit.  There are those who have argued that private charter schools are better at educating students, but there is little or no evidence over the years to demonstrate this.  When government is educating students, its mission is to educate everyone to be a citizen who participates intelligently and critically in a democracy. It may not always succeed, for a myriad of socioeconomic reasons that I could write a book about, but at the very least, we need not worry about its focusing on profits. 


Privatization might work for some kinds of situations in which the work being done is not an essential governmental function, for example, providing a swimming pool. But I am very skeptical about privatization generally, since its focus is always making money, not doing what the government is supposed to do. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more