Skip to main content

In the book The Secret Life of Bees, what are three possible reasons why June rejects Neil every time he asks her to marry him?

In Sue Monk Kidd’s The Secret Life of Bees, June Boatwright proves to be a very complex character. One of these complications revolves around her relationship with Neil. Despite Neil being a supportive and caring partner, June consistently rejects his marriage proposals. The largest reason for her rejections (and the only motive that readers are explicitly told) is that when June was younger she was left at the altar by a former love. Understandably, June’s negative experience makes her wary of future romantic relationships. Another possible reason for her refusal to marry Neil lies in her identity as a feminist. As an unmarried, middle-aged woman who is also college-educated and financially independent, June defies the expectations for women in that time. Due to these facts, one could argue that it simply goes against her personal inclinations to become dependent on a man. A third reason for her refusals could lie in her obligations to take care of the emotionally unstable May. If she were to marry Neil, it would be unlikely for them to stay in the Boatwright house. This would leave the burden of May’s care on August, and as we see on multiple occasions, sustaining May’s fragile mental balance isn't exactly a one-person job. This last reason might also explain why June is able to finally accept Neil’s proposal after May dies.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more