Skip to main content

Are there any examples of synecdoche, metonymy or apostrophe in Emily Dickinson's "'Why Do I Love' You, Sir?"?

One can find apostrophe, metonymy, and possibly synecdoche in this poem by Emily Dickinson. Apostrophe is a dramatic or formal address, often to an inanimate object, such as , "O Life!" However, it can be a kind of exclamatory address to someone absent. So the "Sir" in line one is an apostrophe, as is "Sire" in the first line of the last stanza.


Metonymy names a thing by using something associated with it. In this poem, in the last stanza, the speaker is referring to the sun, but she names it "Sunrise." The idea is that a person is able to see simply because the sun produces light. In the same way, the speaker loves her lover simply because he produces those spontaneous feelings in her.


Synecdoche is harder to get from this poem. With synecdoche, a thing is named for one of its parts. One might think about the "Eye" being a synecdoche for the whole person, but that doesn't seem to be what Dickinson wants to say here. She seems to want to personify the Eye as its own separate entity. It's possible that "Wisdom" could be a synecdoche. One would expect the word used here to be "knowledge," and since "wisdom" is a subset of "knowledge," it might work as a synecdoche. I don't see how "Daintier Folk" can be a synecdoche. I would call that an epithet. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.