Skip to main content

In poem "David" by Earle Birney, what does Bobbie learn from his experience?

Bobbie learns that it is impossible to predict the consequences of one small act of carelessness.


In the poem, Bobbie goes mountain-climbing with his friend, David. The two friends climb a mountain in the Ramparts Range, Sundance Peak, Mount Inglismaldie, the Fortress, and the Finger in the Sawback Range. They also climb Mount Gleam, but it is a fictitious mountain. It is while climbing the Finger that David loses his balance and falls fifty feet. The accident occurs when David reaches out to steady Bobbie; in trying to save his friend from certain death, David loses his own foothold.


Later, we learn that the accident happened because Bobbie neglected to test his foothold as he climbed the Finger. Thus, he blames himself bitterly for David's suffering. For his part, David refuses to let Bobbie torture himself. He tries to get Bobbie to see that an unintentional mistake does not make someone a villain.


David bleeds profusely from the fall; from the poem, we can deduce that David has been paralyzed by his accident. Both Bobbie and David know that David will not leave the mountains alive; in the end, David asks his friend to do the unthinkable. He begs Bobbie to push him over the ledge so that he can end his suffering. Although Bobbie is horrified at the implications of his friend's request, he respects David's desire to be freed from his tormenting pain.


His merciful deed done, Bobbie tells us that he lost his youthful innocence forever on the day he pushed his friend to his death. Bobbie learns that unintentional mistakes can result in gruesome consequences that precipitate horrific moral choices.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more