Skip to main content

What are two technologies that helped make cell theory possible?

There are no doubt various answers to this question, but two technologies that allowed major tenets of cell theory to be established are the microscope and x-ray crystallography.


The microscope was essential in discovering one aspect of cell theory--that the cell is the basic structural and functional unit of life. The microscope allowed scientists to directly observe that all life was composed of similar units. Later microscopes with higher magnification showed the cells' organelles; there were differences in what types of organelles were present, but similar types of organization became apparent.


X-ray crystallography helped establish another part of cell theory--that DNA is used to transmit genetic information. X-ray crystallography was used by Rosalind Franklin to create photographs that were then used by James Watson and Frances Crick to determine the structure of DNA. The double-helix shape (with complementary base pairs, an earlier discovery) provided a mechanism for how genetic information was transmitted from parent to offspring, and that DNA therefore was the molecule involved in genetics.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more