Skip to main content

What are some reasons why Russell Banks may have written the novel The Sweet Hereafter using multiple points of view?

Russell Banks’ 1991 novel The Sweet Hereafter was inspired by the true story of a school bus crash in Alton, TX that took the lives of 21 children. Banks’ story takes place in a small town that similarly has to deal with the aftermath of a school bus accident that kills numerous local children. The story is told from the points of view of four different characters—Dolores Driscoll, the school bus driver; Billy Ansel, a parent of two children who die in the accident; Mitchell Stephens, a lawyer; and Nichole Burnell, a teen survivor of the crash.


In a New York Times review of the novel (link provided below), Banks himself explains why he chose this narration structure:



"I wanted to write a novel in which the community was the hero, rather than any single individual. I wanted to explore how a community is both disrupted and unified by a tragedy."



Readers see these events unfold from distinct points of view, reminding us that individual experience shapes perception, with each character navigating guilt, blame, confusion, and grief differently. At the same time, we are somewhat objectively removed from the limits of a single perspective. The individual accounts show the universal experience of an entire community in the aftermath of tragedy.


Fans of this novel may want to check out the film adaptation by the same name to see how director Atom Egoyan recreates the multiple point of view effect for the screen. (Link to film trailer provided below.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.