One important long-term effect of the Boxer Rebellion was that the defeat of the uprising enabled Western powers to maintain a major presence (including a military presence) in China, to the detriment of Chinese sovereignty. Once the Boxers were defeated, the Western powers and Japan extracted reparations payments (which most of them returned) and forced China to accept a limited Western military presence in Beijing, where the uprising really took shape. Beyond this, the rebellion destabilized and discredited the Qing Dynasty, which was humiliated in its aftermath. Following the rebellion, the youthful Qing ruler, Pu Yi, was overthrown in a revolution that established a republic. Several years of civil war were followed by the Japanese invasion of Manchuria and later of China proper. So in many ways, the most important long-term effect of the defeat of the Boxers was many years of domestic unrest and turmoil.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment