Skip to main content

In Tuck Everlasting by Natalie Babbitt, what does the phrase or quote "Stone walls do not a prison make, Nor iron bars a cage" mean?

Those lines are the first two lines from stanza four of Richard Lovelace's poem "To Althea, from Prison."  In the poem, Lovelace is using those lines to explain that his imagination, soul, and love are free from any sort of physical prison made by men.  


Those two lines do appear in the short novel Tuck Everlasting, but Winnie's use of the quote is a bit different from Lovelace's poem.  In Chapter 24, Winnie sneaks out of her house in order to help the Tucks rescue Mae from jail.  When Winnie sees the jail and its barred windows, those two lines pop into her head. 



Here, too high for Winnie to see into, was a barred window through which, from the room in front, light glowed faintly. Winnie peered up at it, at the blackness of the bars with the dim gold of the light between. Into her head came lines from an old poem:


Stone walls do not a prison make,


Nor iron bars a cage.



Winnie doesn't know why the lines come to her, but the lines do make sense in Mae's situation.  Mae most definitely is in a prison with iron bars.  She is caged.  But the prison is only a physical cage for her.  What would really make a prison and cage for Mae is not a physical building.  What would utterly cage and destroy her soul and love is separation from her family.  If Mae can't be broken out of jail, her immortal secret will become known.  She will become a freak of nature that everybody else wants to poke, prod, and test.  She would never be able to see her family again . . . forever.  That would be a far greater prison to Mae than any actual four-walled room with iron bars in a window.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.