Skip to main content

Based on the Preface, Introduction and chapters 1-4 of Ian Haney López's Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented...

The answer to this question can be found in Dog Whistle Politics' first chapter, "The GOP's Rise as 'the White Man's Party.'" Barry Goldwater was a Republican who, like George Wallace, saw the opportunity to harness the racist hostilities of the South to power his political ambitions. His political maneuvering as an Arizona senator helped drive the Republican Party to the far right, contributing to its transformation into the aforementioned "White Man's Party." 


As López asserts in this chapter, Goldwater was "a walking embodiment of the Marlboro Man's disdain for the nanny state," while at the same time voting in favor of federal civil rights legislation in 1957 and 1960. His attitudes toward race quickly turned in 1961, when he realized that it was more beneficial to his career to "go hunting where the ducks are"; he began to leverage the division in racial politics of the parties, voting against the 1964 Civil Rights Act (which was otherwise supported by 90% of non-Southern senators) and claiming that he did so to protect "states' rights" and "freedom of association." 


Gaining steam, Goldwater decided to run for president in 1964 and used Wallace's "soft porn racism" techniques to further his campaign. Goldwater led a particularly theatrical campaign in the South, pandering to their racist sensibilities with a tableau of "seven hundred Alabama girls in long white gowns" and "a great field of white lilies" flanking the floor of the football stadium in Montgomery where he was to give a speech. Goldwater's mistake, however, was in railing against the New Deal, which had proved to be very popular in the South after the Great Depression had economically drained the region. This, combined with the fact that Goldwater was a Republican--a party which the South associated with Lincoln, the Confederate's loss in the Civil War, and the fight against segregation in schools--lost him some Southern votes.


Still, Goldwater did manage to pull through in the South. It was ultimately Goldwater's anti-welfare obsession that cost him the presidency, with voters outside of the South (in every state except Arizona) voting against him. Goldwater's foreign policy and militarism certainly didn't make him a more attractive candidate either. Thus, ended the "big-money/small-government conservatism" of the era with progressive governance rising to power. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...