Skip to main content

The Great Awakening was characterized by colorful sermons that appealed to the emotions of the listener. Explain how this characteristic can be...

Edwards definitely uses pathos or an appeal to the emotions in his sermon. This characteristic rhetorical device is utilized to provoke strong emotions like fear, anger, and/ or despair in an audience. Experienced orators or preachers appeal to the emotions of their listeners to try to inspire them to enact changes in their lives.


There are many places in Edwards' sermon where he tries to inspire fear in his audience. For example, he warns his listeners that the fires of hell are just about ready to consume them and that God is angry with more of them than they think.



Yea God is a great deal more angry with great Numbers that are now on Earth, yea doubtless with many that are now in this Congregation, that it may be are at Ease and Quiet, than he is with many of those that are now in the Flames of Hell. . . The Wrath of God burns. . . Damnation don’t slumber, the Pit is prepared, the Fire is made ready, the Furnace is now hot, ready to receive. . . the Flames do now rage and glow.



Throughout the sermon, Edwards piles on the emotional rhetoric; he means to frighten his listeners into submission and whip them into a frenzy of fear and despair. He paints the picture of the devil standing by, ready to "fall upon them and seize them as his own, at what moment God shall permit him." Without fail, he emphasizes over and over again the image of a God who harbors "unmixed, unrestrained wrath" towards those who choose not to repent.


Later, he asserts that the only way to escape such damnation is to be "born again." Soon after, he casts doubt on who has actually achieved this envied status. Edwards thunders that he has "Reason to think, that there are many in this Congregation now hearing this Discourse, that will actually be the Subjects of this very Misery to all Eternity." In fact, he maintains that any one of them listening to his sermon may well end up in the fires of hell.


Edwards keeps his audience in a state of panic and disequilibrium by veering between conflicting, vague statements. On one hand, he promises that those who repent will escape the fires of hell. He also proclaims that most people are less safe than they think. He gives his listeners the impression that, no matter what they do, they are very likely to be doomed to the fires of hell. Edwards definitely appeals to the emotions of fear and despair as he speaks to his audience.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more