Skip to main content

Why do they destroy Old Misery's house in "The Destructors" by Graham Greene?

They destroyed Old Misery’s house because it was there, and because mob mentality took over. 


The boys in this story destroy the house for fun.  It is a way to pass the time.  It sounds very odd, but it was one of those situations where one person suggested the idea, they all went along with it, and they could not seem to stop.  


Old Misery is a bit eccentric, hence the name.  His house was not in good shape to begin with.  After the bombings, he tried to rebuild his house as best he could.  However, he had a reputation as a cheapskate. 



[It] was common knowledge that since the bombs fell something had gone wrong with the pipes of the house and Old Misery was too mean to spend money on the property. He could do the redecorating himself at cost price, but he had never learned plumbing. 



One of the main reasons the gang became destructors is because of the new member, T.  The gang should have resented T, but instead they were enamored of him.  He told them that he had been inside Old Misery’s house, and it was beautiful.  It is T’s idea to destroy the house. 



Blackie said, “Nobody’s going to pinch things. Breaking in—that’s good enough, isn’t it? We don’t want any court stuff.”


“I don’t want to pinch anything,” T. said. “I’ve got a better idea.”


“What is it?”


T. raised his eyes, as gray and disturbed as the drab August day. “We’ll pull it down,” he said. “We’ll destroy it.” 



In order to maintain his status in the group, T has to suggest something serious and explain why he went in the house.  The boys are bored, and jaded.  They amuse themselves by destroying the house because they are there, and it is there.  Any boy who didn’t would be seen as a coward.  That is how the mob mentality works. 


T tells the boys he doesn’t hate Old Misery.  It would be no fun if he did. He seems to be a sociopath.  However, he has a charisma that leads the other boys to follow him.  Therefore, one boy turns a group of boys into destructors.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...