Skip to main content

What does Framton Nuttle know about the Sappletons when he arrives?

Framton Nuttel knows nothing at all about the Sappleton family. He is only calling on them because he was given a letter of introduction by his sister, who seems to have known little about them herself. Vera plans to tell him her ghost story--but first she has to make sure that he is a newcomer to the region and doesn't have any prior knowledge of her family. She asks two direct questions.



"Do you know many of the people round here?" 


"Hardly a soul," said Framton. 


"Then you know practically nothing about my aunt?" pursued the self-possessed young lady.


"Only her name and address," admitted the caller. 



This sounds like the kind of innocuous conversation a hostess might initiate, but the information is important to Vera. It is also important expository information for the reader. The reader must be informed that Framton hasn't heard about any family tragedy such as Vera goes on to describe. Saki could have conveyed this information through direct expository prose, but it works better to have Framton convey it in dialogue. The reader will attach less importance to this chit-chat than if the same information were provided directly by the storyteller. It is noteworthy that the reader is kept in the dark until Framton has fled the scene in a panic. Then the reader will understand the girl's entire practical joke all at once. 



"Here we are, my dear," said the bearer of the white mackintosh, coming in through the window, "fairly muddy, but most of it's dry. Who was that who bolted out as we came up?"


"A most extraordinary man, a Mr. Nuttel," said Mrs. Sappleton; "could only talk about his illnesses, and dashed off without a word of goodby or apology when you arrived. One would think he had seen a ghost."


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.