Skip to main content

What literary devices are used in Macbeth, Act 5, Scene 4?

In Act 5, scene 4, Malcolm describes the fact that Macbeth seems to want them to lay siege to his army at Dunsinane castle.  He says, "none serve with him but constrainèd things / Whose hearts are absent too" (5.4.13-14).  In other words, no one serves Macbeth any longer unless they have no choice, and, even then, those men do not serve him with their hearts.  He means that no one feels loyalty or love for Macbeth at this point, but he uses "hearts" to stand in for those emotions: this is an example of metonymy, when an author uses something associated with the thing he means for the thing itself.  


Further, Siward uses personification when he says, "Thoughts speculative their unsure hopes relate, / But certain issue strokes must arbitrate" (5.4.19-20).  He is personifying "thoughts" as being able to have hopes and "strokes" as being able to arbitrate conflict.  What he means is that it is easy for them to sit around and have high hopes for the coming battle (when they are not actually engaging in that battle yet, this is why the thoughts are "speculative"), but that sometimes the only way to resolve a conflict is through violence.


Finally, Shakespeare uses this short scene to increase the pace of the action.  Short scenes like scenes 4-8 in this act, have the effect of seeming to speed up the action, and this increases tension for the audience as the plot builds toward the climax: the fight between Macbeth and Macduff.  By controlling the pacing in this way, Shakespeare heightens tension for the audience.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more