Skip to main content

From what two instincts "natural to human beings" does poetry, according to Aristotle, seem to have sprung?

In the Poetics, Aristotle argues that the impulse to poetry is universal, rather than grounded in particular cultural circumstances. In fact, for Aristotle, the universality of poetry and its grounding in universal instincts are what makes it more valuable and in a sense truer than history, as history tells of what is local and specific and poetry of universal truths about human nature.


The first of the two instincts Aristotle discusses is the instinct for imitation. Even young children enjoy and engage in forms of mimicry, and humans universally seem to find imitation (Greek: mimesis) pleasurable.


The second instinct that Aristotle notes is that for rhythm and harmony. All societies seem to enjoy some forms of music. It is important in the context to remember that Aristotle is discussing ancient Greek poetry, which was performed with musical accompaniment, unlike modern poetry which is normally read privately and silently rather than heard.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.