Skip to main content

How do people feel towards the elephant in "Shooting an Elephant" by George Orwell?

In "Shooting an Elephant," the colonial officers are concerned about the elephant. The sub-inspector who calls Orwell, for example, says the elephant is "ravaging" the area and he wants action to be taken. 


In contrast, the locals are not especially concerned by the elephant, even when it kills an Indian man. They are more interested in the thrill of the chase and the prospect of receiving some meat:



It was a bit of fun to them, as it would be to an English crowd; besides they wanted the meat.



To provide additional contrast, Orwell's narrator believes the elephant will eventually calm down and that there is no reason to harm it:



I thought then and I think now that his attack of "must" was already passing off; in which case he would merely wander harmlessly about until the mahout came back and caught him.



Moreover, while shooting the elephant is "a bit of fun" for the locals, it creates a serious ethical dilemma for Orwell: he has no desire to harm this great animal, but knows he must take action. If he does not, the locals will laugh at him and he will lose his credibility as an imperial official.


It is these contrasting viewpoints which create the story's conflict and demonstrate the true and evil nature of imperialism.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more