Skip to main content

Above all, what did Author Miller want to capture in writing The Crucible?

The primary message that author Arthur Miller was trying to convey in The Crucible is that hysteria and fear come at a high cost. This story draws a parallel between the witch trials that occurred in Salem, Massachusetts and the communist witch hunts of the Red Scare in the author's time.


The hysteria featured in The Crucible begins with a series of accusations by the local minister's young niece, Abigail. The town becomes paranoid of spectral threats to their homes and livelihoods, resulting in real violence towards innocent people. In this sense, Miller is trying to convey the importance of making decisions based on evidence rather than superstition and hearsay. What begins as a seemingly innocuous rumor can turn into a flame that engulfs an entire community. Social pressure is another major theme as many of those who accused the "witches" in the story were just going along with what others told them. Others were afraid that if they did not jump on the bandwagon of accusing their neighbors of being witches, they themselves would become the targets of the mob's ire.


To summarize, Miller wanted to capture the idea that the same paranoia and violence that resulted in the New England witch trials have the potential to lead to more violence in all generations. While the target of the hysteria changes, the human suspicion and weaknesses underlying it remain the same and we are all vulnerable to them if we do not temper them with reason.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.