Skip to main content

What is the historical precedent of populist presidential candidates in the United States?

Populist parties seem an inevitable part of democracy. The existence of demagogues who pander to the fear, anger, and resentment of those who feel marginalized by their societies is attested in ancient Greece; Cleon's rhetoric was in many ways similar to that of many contemporary populists.


In recent memory, Ross Perot was an example of a wealthy businessman who campaigned as an independent on a populist platform. Like Donald Trump, he stirred up nativist sentiment of the sort that is closely allied with racism, particularly directed against Mexicans. 


George Wallace was a Governor of Alabama who was strongly in favor of racial segregation. He ran unsuccessfully for President several times, on a populist platform with a strongly racist bias.


Patrick Joseph "Pat" Buchanan also was a populist to the far right, who ran in the Presidential primaries on a platform that was strongly anti-immigration, anti-Semitic, isolationist, and anti-gay, also preying on people's fears of social change. 


Earlier populist movements, especially those of the nineteenth century, were more closely allied to what in Canada and Europe were Labour parties (Labour in Britain, the NDP in Canada, e.g.), mainly concerned about the welfare of the working poor, exploitation of labor (including child labor), and income inequality.   William Jennings Bryan was an important populist candidate. This earlier form of populism was progressivist, and did much to bring in important reforms such as minimum wage, the eight-hour workday, limits on child labor, etc. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.