In Chapter Four of "The Jesuit Relations," Allan Greer speaks of both sides of the war. He discusses their methods of communicating when they wanted to create a truce, as well as their plans of attack, which often hinged on the element of surprise. Greer describes the treaty formed at Three Rivers, the resulting peace of which encouraged negotiation for returning prisoners of war who had been captive. One particular man named Kiotseaeton from the Iroquois tribe is credited with bringing about this peace treaty. He was brave and courageous; he brought gifts to his enemies and danced for them. The folk tale that has grown out of his contribution to ending the war outlines seventeen specific presents that he brought, and gives him nearly all of the credit for ending the war. Greer details the true facts of, as well as speculation on, this story in this chapter.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment