Skip to main content

Do you think a reason for the US not joining the League of Nations was because of the isolationism mentality many Americans had?

Actually, yes, this was one reason--many Americans felt as though the victorious Allies of WWI were only squabbling over territorial rights at the Versailles treaty table--the main question was not 'how to promote peace,' but rather, 'which nation was getting which piece of territory."  This war was sold to the American people as a war to end all wars and a war to ensure democracy.  The Allied powers, especially the French, British, and Italians, seemed petty in their search for land.  While America would never be truly isolationist, given the peace conferences that happened during the interwar years such as the Washington Naval Conference which limited the size of the world's navies and the Kellogg-Briand Treaty which denounced war as a way of solving the world's problems, America turned away from European problems and mainly focused on events in Central America and the Caribbean during the interwar period.  Another reason that probably had more to do with the United States not joining the League was Wilson leaving out key Senate Republicans from treaty negotiations--this political rift made Wilson's last years in office unproductive in terms of foreign policy.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.