Skip to main content

Why is Spencer's theory is an Evolutionary Theory. Was Spencer interested in social reforms? What would Spencer do about poverty in our society,...

Spencer's theory of "survival of the fittest" is a kind of evolutionary theory. After reading Darwin's On the Origin of Species, Spencer applied some of the ideas of natural selection to the realm of sociology. He believed that groups, which he called "favored races," that possessed advantages would be most likely to survive. Though he applied aspects of natural selection to his ideas, his theory also has elements of Lamarckism, the (erroneous) concept that people can pass traits that they acquire after birth to their offspring. Spencer's theories were applied to sociology and became known as "Social Darwinism," a school of thought that inspired industrialists such as Andrew Carnegie. 


Spencer was a philosopher, not a social reformer. His theories justified the kind of laissez-faire capitalism that developed during the Industrial Revolution, and his theories explained that industrialists such as Andrew Carnegie should be at the top of the economic and social pyramid while others struggled below. Spencer's view on today's poverty would likely be that the economic situation is justified by the fact that those who are fittest have risen to the top, while those struggling in poverty should do so. That way, the poor may not be as likely to reproduce and pass along undesirable characteristics. Spencer was not sympathetic to the poor or working classes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.