Skip to main content

What are the differences between Tom Robinson's and Mayella Ewell's testimonies in To Kill A Mockingbird?

There are marked differences between the two testimonies and I will list them, showing the specific contrasts.


1.  Mayella testified that Tom Robinson only once came to their house. That was when she asked him to chop up the chiffarobe for firewood. Tom testified that she had asked him to do tasks for her on numerous occasions, so that had not been his only visit. 


2.  Mayella said that the day Tom supposedly assaulted her was the same day on which she had asked him to chop up the chifforobe, whilst Tom stated that she had asked him to do that the previous spring, long before the incident for which he was on trial.


3.  Mayella stated that she had promised Tom a nickel for doing the task whilst Tom mentioned that Mayella had only said that she might give him half a nickel, which he refused. 


4.  Mayella refused to testify about her siblings' whereabouts when asked why they did not respond to her cries. Tom said that she had told him that she had saved up seven nickels to send the children away to buy themselves ice creams.


5.  Mayella's testimony was that Tom came into the house after her and grabbed her around the neck, choking her whilst swearing and shouting out what she called 'dirt.' He beat her around the face and then threw her to the floor and sexually assaulted her.


Tom, in contrast, stated that she had asked him into the house and requested that he fix a door's broken hinges. When he discovered that there was nothing wrong with the door, he wanted to leave but she then asked if he could stand on a chair and remove a box from the top of the chifforobe for her. When he was on the chair she grabbed him around the legs which frightened him. He knocked the chair over and she then hugged him around the waist and kissed him.


6.  Mayella testified that she had been screaming, fighting and shouting throughout her supposed ordeal, whilst Tom testified that there had been no screaming at all, only that he had tried to get away from Mayella. He had pushed her and asked her to let him pass.


7.  Mayella's further testimony was that she only remembered her father standing over her shouting, "Who done it, who done it?" Tom declared that Mr Ewell had been shouting through the window, saying: "You goddamn whore, I'll kill ya."


In spite of the conflicting evidence, the jury still returned a verdict of guilty. Their judgement had clearly been tainted by their prejudice, even though Atticus had focused his closing statement on just such misguided lack of objectivity. The evidence obviously favoured Tom Robinson and the jury's final decision was a terrible miscarriage of justice. 


Tragically, Tom Robinson's attempt to help another human being for whom he felt sympathy resulted in his incarceration and then his death. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...