Skip to main content

How is the history of science relevant to science today?

The history of science studies not only developments in science over time, but also the changes in thinking behind those developments. Consider the example of the discovery that the world is round rather than flat; historians of science study the historic event of that discovery, as well underlying changes in scientific thought that came afterward.



An understanding of how science has been studied and practiced in the past lets us do two things. First, it better allows us to examine our current scientific practices. Second, it allows us to understand how scientific values have shifted over time. The history of science reveals large changes in thought as new understandings of the natural world developed. For example, after Einstein released his theory of relativity, the scientific community rapidly shifted several paradigms about the natural world. These change moments are central to the study of the history of science.



It is difficult to consider the history of science without also encountering the philosophy of science. The two fields are closely connected in that when observing the changes in scientific thinking over time, the natural question to ask next is, Why did these changes occur? These two fields—the history and philosophy of science—are an important pair that inform our understanding of science and thought, past and present.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more