Skip to main content

A physics student performs an experiment to measure the efficiency of a go-cart. From rest, he rolls a cart of total mass 95 kg from the top of a...

(A) While the cart is at the top of the ramp but before it starts moving, it has zero kinetic energy K = 0 and its total energy is potential energy, V. (Why is potential energy represented as V? I honestly have no idea, but this is the standard notation. I've also seen U, but for some reason, never P.)

That potential energy is entirely due to gravity, so it is given by `V = m g h`. This system dissipates energy into its environment (hence why its efficiency is not simply 100%), so we should really distinguish initial energy `E_i ` from final energy `E_f`.

`E_i = K_i + V_i`


`E_i = 0 + mgh = (95 kg)(9.80 m/s^2)(3.8 m)`


`E_i = 361 J`

We should give our answer in two significant figures since that's what we were given, so `E_i = 360 J`.

(B) At the bottom of the ramp, the cart has lost all its potential energy, but now has kinetic energy given by `K = 1/2 mv^2`. This is its new total energy.

`E_f = K_f + V_f`

`E_f = 1/2mv^2 + 0 = 1/2(95 kg)(6.7 m/s)^2 `

`E_f = 318.25 J`

Once again, round to two significant figures: `E_f = 320 J`

(C) Efficiency in the sense we're using it here is just final energy divided by total energy:` e = E_f / E_i = (320 J)/(360 J) = 0.89` This system has an efficiency of 89%. That makes sense; we would expect it to be a bit less than 100%.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more