Skip to main content

Do agree with what Atticus says about the mob/gang?

One evening, Atticus stands guard outside the jail where Tom Robinson is being held.  An angry mob of men approaches.  Jem, Scout, and Dill, who had sneaked out, also approach.  Scout speaks to Mr. Cunningham, one of the men in the mob.  She brings up casual topics of conversation, such as telling his son she says hello.  Mr. Cunningham softens and tells the mob to leave.


The next morning, Jem and Scout bring up the mob from the previous evening.  Atticus gives his opinion on the topic:



"A mob's always made up of people, no matter what.  Mr. Cunningham was part of a mob last night, but he was still a man.  Every mob in every little Southern town is always made up of people you know— doesn't say much for them, does it?"  (To Kill a Mockingbird, chapter 16)



Atticus sees the humanity in the mob.  He sees the mob as a group of individuals.  He knows that they are his friends and neighbors.  Maycomb is a small town, and Atticus knows everyone in it.  It is a fact that mobs are made up of people.  Atticus sees beyond this fact.  He sees them as his fellow townsmen.  This also makes the mob seem less threatening.  What do you think?  Do you think that this mob of men should have been viewed as friends and neighbors or as a threat?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.