Skip to main content

Explain how prices play an important role in economic systems.

Before getting to the main answer to this question, we need to note that prices do not play an important role in all economic systems.  Instead, they only play an important role in market economies.  In traditional and command economies, prices are not very important and may not even exist.


In a market economy, however, prices are of supreme importance.  Prices send signals to producers about what they should and should not be making.  Prices send signals to consumers about what they should and should not be buying.  In this way, prices are one of the most important pieces of information in a market system.


In a market economy, how do producers know what to produce?  The government does not tell them.  They could possibly take surveys to ask what they should make, but that would be time-consuming and expensive and it might not even give them good information.  Prices give producers excellent information.  They tell producers how much people are willing to pay for goods and services.  If the price of a certain good is rising, producers know that they should produce more of it.  If the price is falling, they know they should produce less.  Prices tell producers what consumers want, thus giving them the information they need to make good choices about what to produce.


Prices also give consumers information.  Low prices give consumers incentives to buy.  High prices may signal something about the quality of a product.  When prices for a similar good or service are different at different times, this can affect consumer decisions.  For example, if it costs $2 less to go to a matinee movie than an evening movie, more consumers might be motivated to go to the earlier show.  In general, prices help consumers decide which things they will buy.


In these ways, prices are extremely important in market economies.  They do much to help both consumers and producers know how they should behave.  This is why prices can be seen as the “invisible hand” that drives a market economy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.